SWAM studies how action learning affects language-video alignment
Authors report 88.10% easy and 61.56% hard RoboTwin success, and 40.00% versus 23.33% on three real tasks.
14 stories, newest first · one card per story
Authors report 88.10% easy and 61.56% hard RoboTwin success, and 40.00% versus 23.33% on three real tasks.
Against FastWAM, reported LIBERO success moves from 97.0%, 55.3%, and 91.2% to 98.2%, 64.5%, and 91.4%.
On RoboTwin 2.0 it raises average success 10.10 points over π0.5, and real-world success from 71.7% to 85.0%.
VLA-Δ trains robot policies on physical state transitions and beats π0.5 in real-robot tests.
RoboRSI lets a mobile manipulator reuse validated skills, beating baselines by up to 11 points.
DuoMind coordinates multiple robots using VLM orchestrators, VLA action models, and semantic messages.
ProWAM predicts actions and sparse visual sub-goals, posting new robotics scores and 70% real-world success.
ViGAR plans visual subgoals for robot manipulation, beating the best RoboTwin baseline by 12.86 points.
EVO-WAM self-improves world action models on unseen robot tasks without new expert demonstrations.
AnyStep-WAM cuts world-action denoising steps by up to 85% while holding RoboTwin success rates.
Rolling-WAM speeds robotic replanning 4.5x by spreading joint denoising across successive cycles.
Rolling-WAM speeds robot replanning 4.5x by staggering joint video-action denoising across cycles.
DeltaWAM predicts visual deltas and robot actions, raising RoboTwin success while cutting training and inference cost.
RoboDawn lets a VLM control robots via discrete commands, beating trained policies zero-shot and one-shot.
Today 1.6K readers · 2.4K views · 774 reads · all time 189K views